<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arcoarena &#187; Open Rights Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.arcoarena.co.uk/archives/category/open-rights-group/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.arcoarena.co.uk</link>
	<description>Why Walk in Circles?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:15:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Complaining &#8211; The right and wrong way to go about it.</title>
		<link>http://blog.arcoarena.co.uk/archives/280</link>
		<comments>http://blog.arcoarena.co.uk/archives/280#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Rights Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.arcoarena.co.uk/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government have announced a plan to allow people to comment online about their public services. This seems like a sensible idea, an easy way to feedback constructive comments in order to improve public services. Well done the government. Except&#8230;.
The flaw in this plan could very well be the general public as David Mitchell points [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government have announced a plan to allow people to comment online about their public services. This seems like a sensible idea, an easy way to feedback constructive comments in order to improve public services. Well done the government. Except&#8230;.</p>
<p>The flaw in this plan could very well be the general public as <a title="David Mitchell's Observer Column" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/mar/15/online-feedback-public-sector" target="_blank">David Mitchell points out in his Observer column</a>.  The related point to this post is that I&#8217;ve found out I&#8217;m not the only one who&#8217;s been forced to stop reading BBC News&#8217; &#8220;Have Your Say&#8221; boards, and Mr Mitchell links to the excellent <a title="ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com" href="http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com">ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com</a>, a collection of some of the most ignorant, racist nonsense that sadly seems to fill the HYS boards, with introductions that are probably just as offensive.</p>
<p>So, the correct way to complain. Well, I&#8217;m sure the <a title="The Open Rights Group" href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/">Open Rights Group</a> have a few ideas. I&#8217;ve signed up to their <a title="Open Rights Group - RSS News Feed" href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/newsblog/feed/">news feed </a>and get depressed on a regular basis. The most recent post was about the <a title="The Torygraph" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/4987415/All-travel-plans-to-be-tracked-by-Government.html" target="_blank">introduction of e-borders</a>, the scheme to collect passenger information for everyone entering and leaving the UK. The information required will be Name, DoB, Passport number. The UK Boarder Agency also says &#8220;We will also collect other passenger information, for example details of reservations and payment.&#8221;.</p>
<p>So to re-cap; Name, address, credit card number and the government&#8217;s previous record of data protection&#8230;&#8230;nope can&#8217;t see any problem here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.arcoarena.co.uk/archives/280/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
